The Maerowitz Law Firm, LLC is excited to announce we have moved to a new office address! We are now at:
16815 S. Desert Foothills Pkwy., Suite 121
Phoenix, AZ 85048
A virtual tour will be posted on our social media including YouTube channel soon!
The Maerowitz Law Firm, LLC is excited to announce we have moved to a new office address! We are now at:
16815 S. Desert Foothills Pkwy., Suite 121
Phoenix, AZ 85048
A virtual tour will be posted on our social media including YouTube channel soon!
Over six years ago, I wrote an article on set asides: 2015 Article on Set Asides. Since then there have been several changes in the law. I go through the biggest changes in a recent video I uploaded on the MaerowitzLaw YouTube Channel.
This video includes some of the 2021 updates in the law. For the most part, the law now has expanded the applicability of set asides generally making more people eligible to set aside their convictions. Whether a judge grants the request may depend on several factors, but some of the convictions that were previously ineligible for a set aside are now eligible.
It normally does not cost too much to hire a lawyer help with this. You can reach me at 480-927-3700 for a free consultation to discuss this process and find out if you are eligible for a set aside. After speaking with me sometimes, clients will attempt this process on their own and others will end up hiring my services.
Check out my new article titled “Why Hiring the Right Injury Lawyer can Make a Big Difference.” If you are not a subscribed of Arizona’s Asia Today newspaper, you can read the paper online at https://asiatodayaz.com/. My article is on Page 3 in the August 2021 issue. Stay tuned, there should be another article by me in the next month or two!
Many lawyers, including myself, will frequently take personal injury cases on a contingency. What this means is that the legal fee is contingent on the recovery at the end of the case. Typically, the client is only responsible to pay legal fees if there is a recovery and the legal fee is determined by a percentage of the total recovery. Many seem to believe that the lower the contingency rate a law firm is willing to charge means the client will end up getting more money. However, this is a fallacy as the existence and amount of recovery will typically have much more influence on how much you get paid rather than the contingency fee rate. I do not like the term “discount” attorney because when it comes to a contingency fee, how much the client can afford to pay an attorney is immaterial since the client is not paying legal fees prior to recovering. If a good attorney recovers much more than the “discount” attorney for the same type of case then the client is going to be left with much more despite the higher contingency fee.
Another consideration regarding contingency fees is to determine whether the fee is based on the actual amount of work. For example, if a discount attorney is offering a 25% contingency fee but refuses to litigate cases, then the 25% contingency fee is not such a good deal. Some cases may require litigation to properly resolve the case if the other side denies liability even when a case has merit. In many of my cases, the contingency fee will be depending on the stage of the case and amount of work that is required to properly pursue a claim. Despite many cases requiring me to litigate in Court, if a case can be appropriately resolved without litigation, my contingency fee is typically much less.
Before hiring an attorney on a contingency, look carefully at the fee agreement. Is the attorney differentiating the fee based on the amount of work completed? If an attorney is charging a 25% fee regardless of the work, how much investment will they really put into your case? How often does that attorney even go to litigation? Some large insurance companies will not reasonably settle a valid injury claim unless you proceed with litigation. As a result, hiring an attorney that rarely litigates cases may result in a small recovery if a case is prematurely settled.
Prior to hiring a personal injury attorney, you should make sure you hire an attorney you trust and feel comfortable with. Many personal injury attorneys, including myself, offer free consultations. If you or someone you know has been injured such as in a car accident, call me at 480-927-3700 for a free consultation.
There is unfortunately a lot of incorrect or misleading information particularly when it comes to personal injury attorneys. This is the first post of a series where I plan to provide an honest look at some important considerations when hiring a personal injury attorney.
Before we even get into considerations when selecting an attorney. There is an overarching question that must be asked. Do I Even Need an Attorney to Handle my Car Accident Case? The short answer is yes as I explain below.
Unfortunately, among some members of the community, personal injury attorneys have developed a bad reputation. It seems with injury attorneys more so than other areas of practice there is a bevvy of ridiculous advertisements and gimmicky nicknames that attorneys use to market themselves. As a result, some skepticism before hiring an attorney is warranted. While there may be a lot of bad attorneys out there, hiring a good attorney can substantially help properly resolve your accident case.
Whenever you have any sort of bodily injured and someone other than you is at fault, it is almost always a good idea to have an attorney working for you. When you are injured, it is stressful enough dealing with your injuries and seeking treatment. Adding an attempt to resolve your bodily injury claim with an insurance company on your own can be daunting. Hiring a good attorney like myself is absolutely essential to reduce the stress and make sure your injury claim is properly handled.
When I am consulted on an accident case or really any of my practice areas, my goal is to be upfront and honest with clients so my client is well-informed before hiring me. There are several instances where I may tell a potential client that hiring me might not make sense. I want to make sure my client is well-informed before he or she agrees to retain me. I frequently take injury cases on a contingency, meaning my client does not pay any legal fees unless there is a recovery. While this means I would get paid out of a client’s potential recovery, the cost of legal fees is frequently offset by getting a good monetary resolution for my clients. In other words, on cases with a recovery my client will frequently get paid more than he or she would have even after attorney fees. Thus, why deal with the stress of handling a case on your own and risk messing it up or not getting the full value you deserve?
So Tip #1 is this: even if you do not ultimately hire an attorney, at least consult a good personal injury attorney before deciding to handle things yourself. My consultation is free so there really is no harm in a quick phone call to see if I can be of assistance: 480-927-3700.
The Maerowitz Law Firm, LLC has moved! Our new phone number is 480-927-3700.
We have grown our office to a larger space. During the pandemic, attorney Matt Maerowitz is still offering free consultations on criminal and personal injury matters. We are able to accommodate virtual meetings as well to avoid in-person contact during these times.
Our New Contact Information Is:
The Maerowitz Law Firm, LLC
4001 E. Mountain Sky Ave., Suite 107
Phoenix, AZ 85044
Phone: 480-927-3700
Given the concern regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, courts around Arizona have largely avoided all in-person hearings. Many matters previously set for April and May have been converted to telephonic, video, or continued. On Friday May 8, the Arizona Supreme Court issued Administrative Order No. 2020-75 providing very important rules and guidelines for Arizona courts. Starting in June many courts will be resume in-person hearings subject to several measures limiting measures to reduce the spread of coronavirus.
If you have a pending criminal case in court to attend to, there are a few very important things to keep in mind for the next several months:
While the above may provide helpful guidance to members of the public, there are numerous rules and regulations outlined in the Arizona Supreme Court Order that may affect your rights and responsibilities. You can view the full Arizona Supreme Court Order here: Arizona Supreme Court Admin Order No. 2020 – 75.
If you are facing criminal charges, it is highly recommended you consult an attorney immediately. Call criminal defense attorney Matt Maerowitz for a free consultation at 480-465-4032.
Being involved in a car accident can be a traumatic experience no matter what the circumstances are. It is important to do the best you can to stay calm and follow these simple tips. The below tips are intended for the vast majority of auto-accidents not involving serious physical injury:
If you or somebody you know is involved in a car accident, call attorney Matt Maerowitz at 602-912-5897 for a free consultation.
Image courtesy of Naypong at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Marijuana law is one of the most rapidly evolving areas of law nationwide. Half of the states, including Arizona, have legalized marijuana for medical purposes. Many of these new legalization laws have been enacted within the past ten years, which has resulted in a lack of historical precedent and court confusion on how to interpret the laws.
There had previous
ly been a misconception that Arizona courts have decided the odor alone is not sufficient to support a search. However, there was actually an appellate split where two divisions of the Arizona Court of Appeals dealt with very similar issues, but came out with seemingly opposite results. In the earlier State v. Sisco, 238 Ariz. 229, (App. 2d Div. 2015) the court decided that the scent of marijuana alone does not support a search, whereas in State v. Cheatham, 237 Ariz. 502, (App. 1st Div. 2015) decided that odor alone can support a search. Although these two July 2015 cases had some arguable distinctions, the Arizona Supreme Court reviewed both decisions and provided clarity.
Today, the Arizona Supreme Court has decided that notwithstanding the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), the odor of marijuana alone is sufficient for an officer to have probable cause to search. Personally, I think the Court got it wrong and goes against the intent of AMMA. I think this decision detrimentally affects all Arizonans.
For example, the police can now secure a warrant to search your apartment if the police smell marijuana from outside. They might do this even if it turns out that the smell of marijuana is coming from a neighboring apartment but police confuse it for yours. I wish I could say this is such an extreme example, but this is pretty close to what actually happened in Sisco where the police first searched the wrong unit. 238 Ariz. at 232. What’s worse is you might have your apartment searched when the smell is coming from your neighbor who might actually be using marijuana under AMMA as prescribed.
The Supreme Court did note that the odor alone standard constitutes “probable cause unless” in that law enforcement officers may have evidence of AMMA-compliant use or possession that might dispel probable cause ordinarily established by just the smell of marijuana. However, in practice, I cannot imagine this making any difference. Short of a patient or caregiver providing an AMMA card it is hard to imagine what type of evidence officers might consider demonstrating marijuana use consistent with AMMA.
The only language within the decision that gives me hope is that the Arizona Supreme Court notes in Paragraph 16 of State v. Sisco that “if Arizona eventually decriminalizes marijuana, our analysis and conclusion in this context might well be different.”
The Arizona Supreme Court’s opinions may be viewed at the following links:
Click to access CR150265PR.pdf
Click to access CR150286PR.pdf
Image courtesy of Zuzuan at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Deep into the information age of the internet, it amazes me how easily personal information can be accessed from a few keystrokes and clicks. I feel strongly about the importance of privacy; however, information on the internet is becoming increasingly less private. What is published on the internet can often be accessed by third parties whether you like it or not. As a result, it is very important to exercise restraint when posting information online.
Even without having to hire a private investigator, I often research the opposing parties and witnesses and you’d be surprised what I’ve occasionally found on the web to benefit my clients! What people sometimes forget is that although posts on social media sites like Facebook are intended to be semi-private, it normally is not all too difficult to access them. For better or worse, Arizona also provides the public with access to many criminal and civil records.
Quite frankly, I have also encountered instances where the opposition has tried to do the same against my clients. While that photo of double fisting beers may be all fun and games among your Facebook friends, it may impact you when a legal case is pursued for or against you. Also once it is on the internet, it goes into the public sphere and sometimes can be difficult to remove. Everyone has heard about employers finding prospective hires on Facebook; however, it goes well beyond that. Next time you post anything online, ask yourself whether you would feel comfortable if all of your present or future adversaries saw that content. If not, then the internet isn’t the place for it!
Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net